Government quoted wrong figures of 40 % post-harvest loss on FDI in Retail issue. 
Its own study says loss is only 6% to 18%.
The
 Union Government has deliberately exaggerated figures of post-harvest 
losses of agricultural produce to justify its decision of allowing FDI 
in Retail. Various quarters of the Government have repeatedly said that 
40% wastage of fruits and vegetables is alarming and therefore FDI in 
Retail is required to develop the backend infrastructure. In reality, as
 per a detailed study commissioned by the Government and conducted by 
Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology(CIPHET), 
Punjab,the wastage of fruits is only between 6 to 18% and vegetables is 
between 6 to 12.5 %.
The government is thus citing false and misleading 
information to aid and abet the entry of multinationals into the 
country. It is acting against the interest of millions of its citizens. 
Never before have the people been betrayed by their own government in 
this fashion post-independence.
According to CAIT National Secretary General Mr. 
Praveen Khandelwal, “The report was prepared at the direction of 
parliamentary committee, so the genesis is requirement of parliament. 
The Ministry of Food Processing Industry asked the Indian Council of 
Agricultural Research (ICAR) to conduct a study on post-harvest losses. 
The ICAR in turn asked Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and
 Technology (CIPHET) to conduct a study. The CIPHET in its Press Release
 said that it conducted the study with the help of Indian Statistical 
Research Institute and used scientific methods to reduce errors. The 
CIPHET study was given to Government of India in July 2010. The 
government has been misleading the nation for the past two years on this
 issue.”
CIPHET’s nationwide quantitative assessment of 
harvest and post-harvest losses in 2010 covered 46 agricultural produce 
in 106 randomly selected districts. It revealed that wastage of Fruits 
is only between 6% to 18% and vegetables between 6% to 12.5 %. Wastage 
is lower for other items: for crop (3.9 -6.0%), cereals (4.3-6.1%), 
pulses (4.3-6.1%), oilseeds (6.0%), meat (2.3%), fish (2.9%) and poultry
 (3.7%).
The summary of the study of post-harvest loss is 
available on the website of Ministry of Food Processing. In a written 
reply to the Lok Sabha in February 2011, Minister of State for Food 
Processing Shri Harish Rawat referred to the CIPHET study. On May 3,2012
 Minister of State for Food Processing Industries ShriCharan Das Mahant 
informed the Parliament that cumulative wastage in fruits and vegetables
 is estimated between 5.8% and 18%. The Government has been fully aware 
of the facts and figures of post-harvest wastage. In the Union Budget 
2012-13 under Implementation of Budget Announcements in Para no.65 again
 the figure of 40% wastage of fruits and vegetables is quoted. What is 
compelling the Government to repeatedly say that there is post-harvest 
wastage of about 40% in the Country?
The CIPHET report has also been quoted, with tables 
on Page 84-85, in the report of Working Group on Agricultural 
Infrastructure constituted by the 
Planning Commission. Even 
Dr. Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission 
also said that In India 30% of fruits and vegetables and 5-7% grains are
 wasted-quoted nowpublic.com.
On 25th November, 2011(16 months after the CIPHET 
study), the Department of Industrial Promotion and Planning (DIPP) under
 Ministry of Commerce placed a note as to why FDI in Retail is 
necessary. It states that "as per some industry estimates, 35-40% of 
fruits and vegetables and nearly 10% of food grains in India are 
wasted.” The same words were repeated in the Discussion Paper of DIPP 
released on 6th July, 2010 and it was made a major argument for allowing
 FDI in Retail. Which “industry source “did the DIPP rely on? The 
ASSOCHAM and Yes Bank were fully aware of the CIPHET report. Why not 
they made efforts to correct the Government figures is again a big 
question? It is further questionable that when CIPHET study figures were
 available why the “industry estimates” were quoted by DIPP? If the 
CIPHET study was not correct, why the Government did not contradicted 
the figures quoted by CIPHET up till now.
The Prime Minister’s address to the nation also 
mentions that one third of fruits and vegetables which at present are 
wasted can be saved by building new warehouses, cold-storage and modern 
transport system. Whereas on the other hand, the Notification issued on 
20th September, 2012 while defining the backend infrastructure does not 
mention "cold storage and modern transport system."
There are more questions attached to this issue. 
What was the figure of food wastage quoted in the Cabinet note on the 
basis of which the Cabinet allowed FDI in Retail Trade If it was 40% why
 not the Minister of Food Processing and Minister of Agriculture 
contradicted the figures since they were aware of real figures?  The 
statement of Delhi Chief Minister Mrs. Shiela Dixit made in presence of 
Mr. Anand Sharma on 1st October, 2012 at a Rally at her residence in 
which she stated that 30% fruits and vegetables go waste due to 
unavailability of cold storage, gives an impression that even the Chief 
Ministers of States were also briefed the figure of food wastage to the 
tune of 40%.
Interestingly, the nations like USA and Canada where
 global retail giants are operating their business activities are 
actually having the wastage of 40% food, as per reports available.
This is a unique case where the elected government is putting out 
false propaganda against the interests of the masses of people to 
support the multinational companies. It is not late even now. The CAIT 
appeal is for the government to show its bona fides and withdraw the 
anti-people notification on FDI in 
retail.
For more information please contact CAIT, Secretary General, Mr. Praveen Khandelwal@9891015165, 9310199771
No comments:
Post a Comment