Akkunji,
her Commonwealth and Asian Games 4X400m relay gold-winning quartet
member Sini Jose, Priyanka Panwar and Tiana Mary Thomas were banned for
one year, along with three other athletes, in December last by a
National Anti-Doping Agency panel, virtually ending their London
Olympics dreams.
They
had been handed a reduced punishment of one-year ban on the ground that
"the athletes were not found guilty of intentionally taking the banned
substances".
The
four athletes had since appealed against the one-year ban, praying
before a NADA Appellate panel headed by C K Mahajan that they be
absolved of all punishment as they had consumed the banned substances on
the orders of their coach.
The
NADA Appellate panel had reserved its decision on the matter but with
the WADA also appealing against the reduced ban of one year, the panel
is expected to reopen the case.
The next hearing has been scheduled for February 15
NADA
Director General Rahul Bhatnagar told that the WADA had filed an appeal
against the reduced penalty and the matter would come up before the
NADA Appellate panel on February 15.
"WADA
has filed an appeal, seeking a harsher punishment of two years under
the Rules. According to WADA's contention the athletes should not have
been handed lighter punishment on the ground that they don't know they
were taking banned substances," Bhatnagar said.
"What
WADA says is that under the rules the athletes will have to bear the
responsibility whether he or she had taken the banned substances
intentionally or unintentionally."
"The
fact that banned substances were present in their urine sample should
be enough to attract maximum 2-year ban for first time offender. This is
what the WADA appeal meant," Bhatnagar said.
International
Association of Athletics Federation is also expected to file appeal
against the one-year bans handed out to Mandeep Kaur and Juana Murmu.
No comments:
Post a Comment